The United States is considering slapping fresh economic sanctions on Uganda after Parliament passed the Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2023 that would see anyone engaging in acts of homosexuality facing 20 years in jail and a death penalty for convicts of aggravated homosexuality.
National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby on Wednesday said if the legislation was signed into law, Washington would “have to take a look” at imposing economic sanctions on Uganda.
Kirby further said enacting the controversial Bill would be “really unfortunate” since most U.S. aid is in the form of health assistance to combat HIV/AIDS.
In 2014, Washington imposed sanctions on Uganda after Parliament passed the previous Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2009.
The Bill was assented to by the President in February 2014 and later annulled by the Constitutional Court in August 2014 on grounds of lack of quorum.
At the time, the Department of State blocked entry into the United States by certain Ugandan officials whom Washington said were involved in serious human rights abuses, including against LGBT individuals.
The US further discontinued or redirected funds for certain programmes involving the Ugandan Police Force, National Public Health Institute and Ministry of Health, and canceled plans to conduct a US military-sponsored aviation exercise in Uganda.
Backlash
The Anti-homosexuality Bill 2023 has since attracted backlash from the international community.
However, Ugandan lawmakers say the provisions embedded in the Bill seek to protect the traditional family by prohibiting any form of sexual relations between persons of the same sex and promotion of such acts.
The Bill also seeks to address the gaps of other laws in Uganda including the Penal Code Act, Cap 120, as well as supplement provisions of the Constitution by criminalizing same sex acts.
While considering the Bill, legislators agreed to a penalty of shs1 billion imposed on a legal entity convicted of promoting homosexuality and proposed a life sentence in prison for an individual convicted of committing the offence of homosexuality, whereas attempting to perform the act would attract a seven year prison term.
The Bill provides for a three year imprisonment for a child convicted of the act of homosexuality which is in line with section 94(1) (g) of the Children Act, Cap 120.
The United States did not specify which economic sanctions would possibly be imposed on Uganda.
Through the 13 U.S. government agencies that comprise the U.S. Mission in Uganda, the United States says it invests almost USD 1 billion (Shs 3.6 trillion) annually in Ugandan communities, largely through more than 100 implementing partners and civil society organizations, many based in Uganda and Ugandan-led, that deliver programs to every district in Uganda.
“You may not always see our flag on large buildings or billboards, but as a result of the United States’ investment, millions of Ugandans are living healthy, learning better, earning more, and participating more fully in their communities,” said the outgoing U.S. Ambassador Natalie Brown at a recent press briefing.
She cited the 1.3 million HIV+ Ugandans receiving U.S.-funded ARV treatment, the United States donating more than 18 million COVID-19 vaccine doses – free of cost, and the more than 4,700 Ugandan professionals who have participated in U.S. government-supported exchange programs.
The U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Wednesday the Anti-Homosexuality Act passed by the Ugandan Parliament would “undermine fundamental human rights of all Ugandans and could reverse gains in the fight against HIV/AIDS” and urged the Ugandan Government to “strongly reconsider the implementation of this legislation.”
The White House Press Secretary Jean Pierre yesterday told a press conference in Washington the U.S. had “grave concerns with the passage of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill by the Parliament of Uganda and increasing violence targeting LGBTQI+ persons.”
She said if the Bill was signed into law and enacted, it would impinge upon universal human rights, jeopardize progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS, deter tourism and investment in Uganda, and damage Uganda’s international reputation.
“The bill is one of the most extreme anti-LGBTQI+ laws in the world,” said Pierre, adding, “Human rights are universal. No one should be attacked, imprisoned, or killed simply because of who they are or whom they love.”
During the same press conference , Pierre was asked to comment on Florida Governor DeSantis’ decision to expand the rules that forbid classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity.
She responded: “ It’s wrong. It’s completely, utterly wrong. And — and we’ve been very cry- — crystal clear about that, when it comes to the “Don’t Say Gay” bill and other — other actions that this governor has taken in the state of Florida. But make no mistake: This is a part of a disturbing and dangerous trend that we’re seeing across the country of legislations that are anti-LGBTQI+, anti-trans, anti the community in a way that we have not seen in some time.”
Ugandans residing in the diaspora have taken it upon themselves to expose what they see as one of the greatest betrayals of modern African democracy the continued funding and support of African dictatorships by Western nations, especially the brutal regime of General Yoweri Kaguta Museveni. For decades, these courageous Ugandans have organized demonstrations outside embassies, high commissions, and notably outside Uganda House in London, carrying placards, chanting freedom slogans, and calling on the international community to halt its enabling role in sustaining one of Africa’s longest-surviving autocracies.
These protests are not mere acts of symbolism. They are expressions of deep-rooted frustration, sorrow, and outrage. They are a direct response to decades of betrayal, impunity, and bloodshed. These brave men and women many of whom were forced into exile due to political persecution have vowed to remain the voice of the voiceless back home. Their unwavering activism speaks not only to the resilience of the Ugandan spirit but also to the urgent need for global accountability.
General Yoweri Museveni came to power in 1986, promising democracy, freedom, and a fundamental change in the governance of Uganda. Four decades later, the reality could not be more disheartening. What began as a supposed liberation movement soon devolved into a regime characterized by severe repression, widespread corruption, militarism, nepotism, and a horrifying disregard for basic human rights.
Museveni’s rule has been marked by the persecution of journalists, arbitrary arrests of opposition leaders, the assassination and abduction of political dissidents, and the militarization of civilian life. Security operatives and military personnel act with impunity, abducting youth, torturing civilians, and suppressing dissent all under the guise of maintaining national security.
What is even more disturbing is that all this is happening under the watchful eye of the international community, with funding, training, and arms supplied in large part by Western allies such as the United States and the United Kingdom.
The Uganda diaspora accuses Western powers of blatant hypocrisy, championing democratic values at home while enabling autocratic regimes abroad. Year after year, millions of dollars flow from Western coffers into Museveni’s government under the pretense of promoting development, security, and good governance. In reality, much of this aid is diverted to strengthen Museveni’s grip on power. It bankrolls the military, funds the police state, and reinforces the very institutions responsible for silencing Uganda’s pro-democracy movement.
From the iron-fisted crackdowns on peaceful protests to the brutal imprisonment of political opponents such as the countless supporters of Hon. Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu, popularly known as Bobi Wine there is overwhelming evidence that Western funds are aiding repression rather than reform.
The Ugandan diaspora, therefore, poses an important question: How can the West claim to support democracy and human rights while simultaneously sponsoring a dictator who has turned Uganda into a blood-soaked prison for dissenters?
The diaspora protests are driven not by politics, but by pain. The pain of lost loved ones. The pain of young lives cut short. The pain of mothers crying for disappeared sons. Under Museveni’s regime, extrajudicial killings, disappearances, abductions, and torture have become routine. The government targets not criminals, but young Ugandans who dare to dream of a better future. Young people whose only crime is wearing red berets, chanting People Power, or aligning with the opposition National Unity Platform (NUP).
Families are torn apart as security forces abduct and detain activists incommunicado. Torture chambers infamously known as safe houses are used to crush the spirit of resistance. The judiciary, now an extension of the executive, offers no justice. The legislature has been reduced to a rubber stamp. Civil society is under siege.
It is this horrifying reality that propels Ugandans abroad into the streets. Their protests are a cry for the world to open its eyes to the genocide unfolding in slow motion.
Complicity by the West, When Aid Becomes a Weapon
What the diaspora is making clear through their activism is that Western funding is not neutral. It comes with consequences. Financial aid that goes into the hands of a tyrant becomes a weapon of oppression. The diaspora protesters argue that this aid is not only misappropriated but extended with either gross negligence or deliberate complicity. After all, how can nations with advanced diplomatic and intelligence machinery be unaware of what their money is funding?
The Group of Seven (G7) nations, along with institutions such as the World Bank and IMF, must be held to account for the roles they play. The diaspora’s call is straightforward: Stop financing the suffering of Ugandans. Stop aiding Museveni’s dictatorship.
A Global Appeal: Redefining International Solidarity
These demonstrations by Ugandans in the diaspora are not merely internal affairs. They are part of a broader global appeal to redefine international solidarity. In an era where democracy promotion has become a buzzword, the Ugandan crisis forces a moral reckoning. The West must ask itself whether it truly believes in democracy for all or only for its own citizens.
The diaspora calls upon Western citizens, human rights organizations, international media, and progressive governments to stand in solidarity with the Ugandan people. Not with empty words, but with action. With sanctions on individuals responsible for atrocities. With investigations into foreign aid misuse. With diplomatic pressure. With suspension of military cooperation. But most importantly to stop being the pay master of our oppressors
Voices from the Frontline: The Courage of the Diaspora
What makes this movement particularly remarkable is the personal cost paid by those involved. Many of the protesters were once victims themselves exiled journalists, tortured youth, threatened activists, and political asylum seekers. They have rebuilt their lives abroad but remain tethered to Uganda by an unbreakable thread of love, pain, and duty.
Their protests are not performative they are acts of resistance and remembrance. Every chant outside Uganda House is a tribute to a disappeared brother. Every placard is a call to bring back tortured sisters. Every march is an affirmation that Uganda will one day be free.
United Kingdom Leads the Charge
The United Kingdom has become a key battleground for this diaspora-led movement. Outside Uganda House in London, a defiant crowd gathers regularly to remind the world of Uganda’s suffering. With drums, megaphones, Ugandan flags, and revolutionary songs, these patriots have turned the streets into a courtroom, the placards into affidavits, and the slogans into testimonies.
They have refused to be silent. They have refused to let the memory of the dead fade. They have refused to let the world normalize dictatorship. For this, they deserve not just applause but our deepest respect.
The Final Message: It’s Time to Choose
To the Western powers: the time has come to choose. Will you stand with the people of Uganda, or will you continue funding their oppressor? Will you support democracy in practice or only in theory? Will you champion human rights universally or selectively?
The diaspora has spoken with clarity, conviction, and courage. Now it is time for the international community to listen and to act.
To all our comrades in the United Kingdom and around the world who continue to raise their voices against tyranny your fight is just, your efforts are noble, and your courage is the torch lighting the way to a free Uganda.
THE ROLE OF LAWYERS IN DEFENDING SOCIAL JUSTICE IN A DICTATORSHIP
H.E Bobiwine at ULS
This morning, Bobi Wine, the President of the National Unity Platform and leading voice of Uganda’s pro-democracy movement, delivered a powerful and deeply personal keynote address to the members of the Uganda Law Society and the Ugandan public. His message was as bold as it was urgent: the legal profession must rise to its moral responsibility of promoting social justice by defending human rights and electoral integrity no matter the cost.
With his signature mix of clarity and courage, Bobi Wine opened by reflecting on his own journey and the dream that had been with him since childhood — the dream of becoming a lawyer. A dream that, like many of Uganda’s youth, was delayed by poverty, dictatorship, and lost opportunity, and only came to fruition last year, in his 40s, after years of struggle and sacrifice.
This was not just a personal anecdote — it was a political indictment. Bobi Wine emphasized that the State has a non-negotiable responsibility to subsidize life for its citizens — to provide education, health care, opportunity, and dignity — because only then can every Ugandan have a fair shot at a meaningful life. In his words, “A government that abandons its people to fend for themselves, while looting national resources, is not just negligent. It is illegitimate.”
He reminded the audience that his own delayed education was not due to laziness or lack of ambition, but due to the structural violence of a corrupt and unequal system — one that millions of Ugandan children are still trapped in. “My story is the story of so many,” he said. “We are not where we are because we lacked potential, but because the system was designed to hold us back.”
CALLING OUT JUDICIAL COWARDICE MASQUERADING AS LEGAL DOCTRINE
Bobi Wine then turned his fire toward a subject rarely discussed so openly in Uganda — the complicity of the Judiciary in the oppression of Ugandan citizens. With unflinching honesty, he condemned what he called “judicial cowardice dressed up as legal doctrine.”
He boldly called out the Judiciary’s long-standing tendency to hide behind conservative legal principles to justify injustice and protect military dictatorship. “Since independence,” he said, “judicial officers have repeatedly used ‘doctrine’ as a shield — not to defend justice, but to protect power.”
He especially criticized two specific doctrines that have been used to dismiss legitimate electoral challenges: the ‘Political Question Doctrine’ and the ‘Substantiality Test.’ These, Bobi Wine argued, have become legal tools of repression — used by the Supreme Court to throw out compelling evidence of vote rigging, electoral violence, and fraud in Museveni’s elections.
In one of the most striking moments of his speech, Bobi Wine stated:
“Even when judges know that any single act of rigging—however small—was done to alter the final result… even when they know that no one rigs an election just for the sake of it, but to win it… even when they know that State-led electoral malpractice destroys the legitimacy of the entire election… they still go ahead to say it was not ‘substantial.’”
And why? Because, in Bobi Wine’s words, “They would rather feel safe than uphold their judicial oath.” These words struck deep, drawing the attention not only of those in the room but across Uganda.
LAWYERS MUST CHOOSE: SILENCE OR SOLIDARITY
Bobi Wine reminded lawyers that the law is not neutral. It either protects the people or it protects tyranny. He called on all legal professionals to choose courage over complicity.
“Lawyers, by their training and knowledge alone, must play a central role in achieving a just society. Their inaction in times of oppression makes them complicit. Silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality—it is betrayal.”
He invoked the name of Chief Justice Benedicto Kiwanuka, Uganda’s first African Chief Justice, who was abducted and murdered by Idi Amin’s regime. “Ben Kiwanuka refused to bow to tyranny, and he paid with his life. Today, our lawyers fear even to speak. What are we becoming?”
Bobi Wine emphasized that no one is ever safe in a lawless nation. The judges, the lawyers, the politicians — all are vulnerable when a regime begins to devour its own people. “If law cannot protect the least among us,” he said, “then it will eventually fail to protect those who think they are safe.”
THE STRUGGLE FOR A NEW UGANDA
But Bobi Wine’s message was not only one of condemnation — it was also a message of hope, resistance, and responsibility. He called on Ugandans — especially the legal fraternity — to reclaim the law as a tool of liberation, not repression.
He called on lawyers to:
Challenge bad laws and unconstitutional practices Stand up for victims of torture and political persecution Expose the abuse of State institutions by those in power Refuse to normalize impunity and dictatorship
He made it clear that Uganda is at a crossroads, and the legal profession must choose which side of history it wants to be on. “Will you be remembered as defenders of justice — or as enablers of oppression?”
He also reminded everyone that change will not come from the courts alone — but from the collective struggle of all oppressed people. That is why he called for a #ProtestVoteUg2026 — a defiant stand against dictatorship using the very weapon Museveni fears the most: the voice of the people.
“We are building a new Uganda — one built on justice, truth, and accountability. And in that Uganda, the law will serve the people, not those who brutalize them.”
A FINAL WORD
In closing, Bobi Wine warned of the cost of silence, but also affirmed the power of truth. He said the time for fear is over. The time for complicity is over. The time to stand with the people is now.
“Uganda is bleeding. Our children are growing up in fear. Our youth are being abducted, tortured, and murdered for demanding justice. The judiciary cannot keep playing dumb. The lawyers cannot keep hiding behind gowns. The time for polite silence is over.”
If the legal profession will not lead the charge for justice, who will? If the men and women trained to interpret and defend the law cower in silence, then what hope is left for the ordinary citizen?
The future of Uganda depends on a brave and principled legal fraternity. Not tomorrow. Not in some distant time. But now.
Accompanied by a smiling image of Uganda’s 80-year-old ruler, the caption framed this moment as just another routine political development. But to millions of Ugandans especially the youth, this was not news. It was a slap in the face. It was a continuation of a 40-year nightmare disguised as democracy.
I commented under that post calmly but firmly exposing Museveni’s long record of repression, corruption, and illegitimacy. Within hours, my comment had been deleted. By the next morning, BBC News had blocked my account from interacting with their page. I had to access their page using a different account with my comment deleted.
No warning. No explanation. No appeal.
A British publicly-funded media house silenced a Ugandan citizen for exposing decades of abuse, in the comments section of their own post. Whom do they serve, what are they protecting??
What Did I Say That Deserved to Be Erased?
Here’s the truth that BBC did not want to remain under their post,
For nearly four decades, Yoweri Museveni has not ruled Uganda through democratic consent but through violence, constitutional manipulation, and military force. Since 1986, he has held onto power through rigged elections, brutal crackdowns, and legislative coups. He was not elected by the people in 1986, nor in 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016, or 2021.
In 2005, he bribed MPs to remove term limits a safeguard meant to prevent exactly this kind of life presidency. Then in 2017, when age threatened to disqualify him, he sent soldiers into Parliament to beat up lawmakers and remove the presidential age limit by force. These weren’t democratic reforms. They were constitutional rapes carried out at gunpoint.
Museveni didn’t come to power through the ballot. He came with bullets preaching against long-serving leaders only to become Africa’s longest-serving dictator.
Uganda Under Siege By Its Own Government
Uganda is not a democracy. It is a state under internal occupation. The police have become hunters. The army, a personal militia. Parliament, a circus of cowardice. Activists vanish into “torture houses.” Protesters are gunned down in the streets. In November 2020, more than 100 Ugandans were killed in cold blood simply for demanding the release of opposition leader Bobi Wine.
Today, youth unemployment is over 70%, hospitals are crumbling, and education is a luxury. Meanwhile, billions are siphoned through fake contracts, inflated military budgets, and ghost projects. Uganda’s national debt now exceeds 52% of GDP but the money doesn’t build; it maintains dictatorship.
Then the West’s Dirty Hands in Uganda’s Oppression
Museveni survives not on popular support, but on Western protection. Britain, the EU, and the United States continue to arm, finance, and legitimize his regime. To them, Museveni is a “stabilizer” in the Great Lakes region a useful gatekeeper in exchange for oil, gold, and mineral access. Their commitment to democracy ends at their borders.
The same BBC that blocked me would never silence a Ukrainian, Palestinian, or Russian dissident for criticizing a regime. But they erased my voice a Black African fighting for justice in my own country. That is not journalism. That is complicity.
Why Was I Silenced for Speaking the Truth?
If my words were wrong, they could have been debated.
If my tone was aggressive, it could have been challenged.
But I was blocked and erased. That tells you everything.
Museveni fears the youth. He fears the truth. But now, so do his international enablers because the narrative is slipping.
Uganda’s young people are awake, informed, and angry. We are not afraid. Museveni is not a president he is a parasite, a relic clinging to power, feeding off a nation he has robbed for 40 years. He has overstayed, over-bled, and overruled Uganda. And we are ready to take it back.
To the BBC and the West You Can’t Silence Us All
If BBC wants to side with power instead of people, history will judge them. If they believe blocking one activist will stop the truth, they are mistaken. My voice echoes millions of others who are rising to say:
Exclusive1 year ago